OxyContin Addiction: Doctors & Drug Lords

Writen by Anna Henningsgaard

OxyContin is a narcotic drug, an opiate, that has been approved by the FDA to legally treat chronic pain. Chronic pain is documented medical condition, a progressive disease of the nervous system and spine that causes constant a patient to experience constant, excruciating pain. Chronic pain is caused by the failure of the body’s internal pain control systems and is accompanied by changes of the chemical and anatomical makeup of the spinal cord. Left untreated, the condition will spread to unaffected areas. A patient suffering from chronic pain does not produce enough natural opiates, so a pharmaceutical opiate like OxyContin is an effective treatment for the disease.

Unfortunately, drug addicts have abused the medical system and obtained prescriptions of OxyContin in order to feed narcotic habits rather than treat medical conditions. Like any narcotic, OxyContin can be highly addictive and overdosing can be fatal. Illicit prescriptions of OxyContin are both sold and abused on the black market. This situation creates a problem for governmental drug regulating agencies that are trying to take a hard line on drug abuse.

Recently, the government has been cracking down harder on drugs and drug abuse, and this does not mean simply going after the users and abusers of pharmaceutical drugs. The government has been targeting the doctors who prescribe these drugs to patients who then abuse them. The problem here is that it is difficult for doctors to know how their prescriptions are actually applied, and a doctor cannot immediately revoke the prescription of a suspected abuser because withdrawal symptoms cause are equivalent to the pain of torture, and can be fatal. Thus doctors who prescribe OxyContin to patients with chronic pain, and remember the condition will progressively and permanently worsen without this treatment, have been convicted of drug trafficking, had medical licenses revoked, and been sent to prison.

Who the real victim is depends entirely on the circumstances of the individual case. Certainly innocent doctors have been punished for prescribing appropriate drugs to pained patients, but in other instances OxyContin has been prescribed irresponsibly, causing addiction, overdose, death, and contributing to the black market exchange of drugs. If you are on either side of this line and are concerned about the use or prescription of OxyContin, please consult a lawyer immediately and protect your interests.

To find out why you need an OxyContin
lawyer and read articles about dangerous drugs and OxyContin
side effects, visit our website at hugesettlements.com.

If you have
any questions or concerns about filing an OxyContin lawsuit, please contact a
professional OxyContin
attorney right away!

Share This

Smoking In Public Places

Writen by Marcus Barber

Smoking is an outright public nuisance, which should be restricted to the privacy of ones home or other private venues. However, smoking in public places is a privilege that should be snuffed out for good. Smoking is one of the longest lasting bad habits that has permeated American culture since the founding of the country. Its longevity is a testament to its addictiveness.

From the very beginning, smoking was a controversial habit, which was frowned upon due to its addictive nature. One of the original English settlement companies, The London Company, discouraged its American colonists from growing tobacco since it contained some habit-forming compound. Smoking was called “a vile and stinking habit dangerous to the lungs” by King James I in a booklet he wrote attacking tobacco after its introduction into England.

Smoking brings out the worst in otherwise decent people. When a smoker is asked to extinguish their cigarette because the smoke offends a non-smoker, many smokers will argue that they have a right to smoke. There is no truth to that statement. Smoking is a privilege, not a right. However, the Declaration of Independence does say that we have a right to Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. It has been proven that cigarette smoking is an extremely dangerous habit to both the smoker and non-smokers that inhale their second hand smoke. Anything that endangers a persons health, infringes upon that persons right to life as guaranteed by the Declaration of Independence. Therefore, a persons’ right to life is superior to a persons smoking privilege.

There are many reasons that smoking in public should be banned. One of the most important reasons is that smoking is a public health risk. Second hand smoke is sometimes referred to as environmental tobacco smoke. In years past, there were theories that second hand tobacco smoke caused health problems in non-smokers. Doctors now say there is no doubt that second hand smoke causes an increased risk of health problems to non-smokers. Ross Brownson, Ph.D., a professor of epidemiology at the St. Louis University School of Public health says, “Environmental tobacco smoke is clearly a cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. If your spouse smokes or you are around somebody who smokes, don’t breathe their smoke”. Non-smokers may also be getting the worst effects of smoking because they are inhaling cigarette smoke without the benefit of the cigarettes filter.

Second hand smoke greatly increases the risk of bronchitis and lung cancer. In fact, smoking is the cause of ninety-five percent of all cases of chronic bronchitis. In the Department of Health and Human Services report Healthy People 2010: Understanding and improving Health smoking is cited as the single most preventable cause of disease and death in the United States. According to Dr. Peters-Golden, breathing second hand smoke can increase the likelihood of acute bronchitis because even one exposure to cigarette smoke poisons the cilia in a persons lungs.

Since it has been proven that environmental tobacco smoke can cause health problems such as lung cancer and bronchitis in non-smokers, banning smoking in public places would lessen the rates of those illnesses in the non-smoking population. If these non-smokers were not endangered by second hand smoke, they would not contribute to the strain on an already stressed health care system.

The tobacco smoke that lingers after a cigarette has been lit can cause damage to property. Smoke can dull paint, ruin pictures, and cause photographs to deteriorate. If a person who chooses to smoke wants to destroy their own property, that is their choice to make. However, smokers do not have the right to destroy public property, to which all taxpayers contribute.

Wherever there is public smoking there is always the very public and unsightly mess of cigarette butts that litter the ground. At many public places such as stadiums and parks there can be hundreds of used cigarettes on the ground. In many locations, tossing discarded cigarettes on the ground is against the law. Apparently, many smokers do not care about the law and toss their used cigarettes on the ground with impunity.

Clearly, smoking is a scourge upon our society that needs to be eliminated. In many cases, smoking is a social habit. Bans on public smoking will greatly reduce the amount of social places where smokers can meet, socialize and smoke. Banning smoking in public places would not only clean the air of second hand tobacco smoke, but also clear the ground of the infestation of discarded cigarettes.

(c) 2006, Marcus Barber

Marcus Barber is an Author and freelance website publisher. His favorite site is http://www.HiTechGuide.com

Share This

Recovery From Addictions, Part 4

Writen by Margaret Paul, Ph.D.

In Part 1 of this series of articles, I defined substance and process addictions, and described the four major false beliefs that underlie most addictions:

1. I can’t handle my pain.

2. I am unworthy and unlovable.

3. Others are my source of love.

4. I can have control over how others feel about me and treat me.

Part 2 was about the first of these beliefs - learning how to handle pain. Part 3 addressed the second and third beliefs - “I am unworthy and unlovable” and “Others are my source of love.” This section, Part 4, explores the fourth belief, “I can have control over how others feel about me and treat me.”

If I had to choose one false belief that causes the most pain for most people, it would be the belief that we can control how important people in our lives feel, think and behave.

In my work with individuals and couples dealing with addictive behavior, I encounter this belief and the many ramifications of it over and over. It seems very difficult for most people to accept the truth about their lack of control over others. The pain, frustration, loneliness and aloneness that result from not accepting your lack of control may be the underlying cause of your addictions.

Take a moment right now to reflect about what you think and do that is a direct result of this belief.

Do you judge/shame yourself to try to get yourself to act “right” so that others will like you? If you do, you are operating from the false belief that you can control how others feel about you by how you act. You are also operating from the false belief that self-judgment will work to control your own behavior. Judging and shaming yourself can lead to addictive behavior to avoid the resulting pain.

Do you act “loving” to others with the hope that others will act loving to you? If you do, you are operating from the false belief that your behavior controls others’ behavior. It is wonderful to be loving to others because you feel good when you are loving, but when you have an agenda attached of being loved back, then your “loving” is manipulative - you are giving to get. The hurt you feel when others don’t love you back can lead to addictive behavior.

Do you get angry, judgmental and critical of others? If you do, then you are operating from the false belief that anger and judgment will have control over how others feel about you and treat you. You can certainly intimidate others into complying with your demands as long as they are willing to do so, but you cannot control how they feel about you. And they will comply only as long as they do. At some point they might leave, so ultimately you have no control over them. Your resulting stress may lead to addictive behavior.

Do you give yourself up, going along with what another wants of you, such as making love when you don’t want to, or spending time in ways that you don’t want to? If you do, then you are operating from the false belief that giving yourself up will have control over how another feels about you and treats you. A loss of a sense of self can lead to addictive behavior.

Do you withdraw from another or resist another’s requests? If you do, you are operating from the false belief that you can change/control another’s behavior toward you by punishing them through withholding love. The deadness of withdrawal can lead to addictive behavior.

In important relationships, most people do some or all of the above behaviors, resulting from the false belief that you can control how others feel, think and act.

If you really accepted the truth of your lack of control over others, what would you do differently? If you deeply, totally, completely accepted the truth of your lack of control over others feelings and behavior, you would be left with what you CAN control - yourself.

I have seen over and over that people finally take loving care of themselves only when they fully accept the truth of their lack of control over others. It is truly amazing the rapid progress the people I work with make when they finally accept this truth.

Shifting out of this one false belief and into the truth will go a long way toward healing your addictions.

Margaret Paul, Ph.D. is the best-selling author and co-author of eight books, including “Do I Have To Give Up Me To Be Loved By You?” and “Healing Your Aloneness.” She is the co-creator of the powerful Inner Bonding healing process. Learn Inner Bonding now! Visit her web site for a FREE Inner Bonding course: http://www.innerbonding.com or email her at margaret@innerbonding.com. Phone sessions available.

Share This